The 2014 Hepatology Society of the Philippines consensus statements on the management of chronic hepatitis B

Chorinic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection is a serious problem that affects over 300 million people worldwide and is highly prevalent in the Asia Pacific region. In the Philippines an estimate 7.3 million Filipinos or 16.7% of adults are chronically infected with HBV, more than twice the average prevalence in the Western Pacific region. In view of the above, the Hepatology Society of the Philippines (HSP) embarked on the development of consensus statements on the management of hepatitis B with the primary objectives of standardizing approach to management, empowering other physicians involved in the management of hepatitis B and advancing treatment subsidy by the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth). The local guidelines include screening and vaccination general management, indications for assessment of fibrosis in those who did not meet treatment criteria. indications for treatment, on-treatment and post-treatment monitoring and duration of antiviral treatment. Recommendations on the management of antiviral drug resistance, management of special populations including patients with concurrent HIV or hepatitis C infection, women of child-bearing age (pregnancy and breastfeeding), patients with decompensated liver disease, patients receiving immunosuppressive medications or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma are also included. However, the guidelines did not include management for patients with liver and other solid organ transplantation, patients on renal replacement therapy, and children. The consensus statements will be amended accordingly as new therapies become available.

The 2014 Hepatology Society of the Philippines consensus statements on the diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a devastating disease that is increasingly being diagnosed among Filipinos, especially in at-risk populations. There are disease-specific nuances in the evaluation and management of this infection. Furthermore, advances in the field brought about by clinical research are rapidly moulding the way we evaluate and manage HCV patients. Evidently, consensus statements formulated by experts in the field are needed in order to serve as a guide to physicians who see HCV patients in the clinic. With this in mind, the Hepatology Society of the Philippines spearheaded the formation of these statements which aimed to address issues in the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up care of patients with HCV infection.Recommendations on the specific tests to perform in the evaluation of HCV patients before, during and after treatment, and first-line treatment of patients with acute and chronic HCV infection were provided. Treatment algorithms for chronic HCV infection, divided according to viral genotype, were also devised. We acknowledge the limitations brought about by the local inavailability of some drugs/treatment regimens in the local setting at the time of the formulation of these statements. As such, these statements will be revised as soon as new data become locally applicable.  

Noradrenaline vs terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome (no to hepatorenal syndrome): A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional renal impairment associated with advanced cirrhosis. The best treatment is liver transplantation; however, many patients die before this can be done. Terlipressin improves renal function in HRS, but recent studies have shown similar effects with the cheaper and more readily available norepinephrine. This review included randomized trials comparing noradrenaline to terlipressin for patients with type 1 HRS, as defined by the International Ascites Club. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of noradrenaline in the management of HRS in terms of 1) reducing mortality, 2) reversal and 3) occurrence of adverse events METHODOLOGY: For this meta-analysis paper, the researchers utilized an electronic search of databases and manual scanning of reference lists were performed. Standardized eligibility assessment was performed independently by three reviewers. Review Manager 5.0.23 was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as I2 values for inter-trial heterogeneity. Standardized eligibility assessment was performed independently by three reviewers. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were found after electronic and manual searching. Three were assessed for validity and included in the final analysis. The total number of patients across all trials was 95. Noradrenaline was found not to differ from terlipressin in terms of 15-day survival rate (OR 01.17; 95% CI: 0.51-2.66), reversal of HRS (OR1.07; 95% CI: 0.47-2.44), and a post-hoc analysis on disease-free survival (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.34-1.79). Results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with the previous findings (15-day survival: OR=1.21 95% CI = 0.52-2.83; HRS reversal: OR= 1.33, 95% CI = 0.56-3.13; disease-free survival: 1.35, CI =0.56-3.25). Only transient adverse effects were noted with either drugs. CONCLUSION: There is inconclusive evidence that noradrenaline and terlipressin are significantly different in the reversal of HRS and reduction of mortality. Larger trials on noradrenaline or a non-inferiority trial may be needed to establish the equivalence of noradrenaline with terlipressin.

Demographic profile and treatment outcomes of Filipino patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a liver tumor registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies using older diagnostic criteria indicated chronic Hepatitis B and alcohol as the most common etiologies of HCC in the Philippines. No recent studies updated criteria for diagnosis have been published. This study used the diagnostic criteria from the latest APASL guidelines to describe the demographic profile of patients with HCC. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of adult HCC cases from a liver tumor registry in the Philippine General Hospital from 2009 to 2012. Demographics, AFP levels, BCLC stage, Child-Pugh Score, ECOG performance status, treatments received, and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: The HCC prevalence rate was 7.8%, mostly occurring between ages 40 to 65 years. It is more common in males (M:F=4:1). Most of the HCC cases were diagnosed at early stages, with less severity of liver functional impairment compared to older studies. Resection was the common treatment undertaken (50%) and overall mortality rate at the time of hospital discharge was 25%.  CONCLUSION: The profile of HCC patients in this study is similar to previous studies. More cases were recognized at earlier stages with better liver function, implying better treatment outcomes with surgery, although selection bias is recognized.